Skip to content
Best CTV Ad Platforms logoBest CTV Ad Platforms

Platform profile · Ranked 2 of 8

Tatari review: CTV advertising platform profile (2026)

Short answer

Tatari ranks 2 of 8 on our published weights, at 7.30 out of 10. It scores highest in set on outcome measurement and incrementality and lift testing and its lowest scores are on pricing and commitment clarity and launch access. Tatari fits brands that plan streaming and linear TV together and want measurement built around incremental impact, with log-level data access.

By The Playback Desk · Best CTV Ad Platforms · Published 2026-10-15

Desk research from public vendor pages. Editorial assessment; we did not run campaigns on these platforms.

What is Tatari?

"Tatari TV is a subsidiary of Infra TV, Inc." (site footer)

Convergent TV platform for streaming, linear TV and online video. Access: Self-serve platform with optional strategy and services; agencies can license it.

Snapshot: Tatari
Owner"Tatari TV is a subsidiary of Infra TV, Inc." (site footer)
KindConvergent TV platform for streaming, linear TV and online video
AccessSelf-serve platform with optional strategy and services; agencies can license it

Source: Tatari homepage

Minimum spend"Tatari supports flexible minimums"; no dollar figure stated.

Source: Tatari insights: platform comparison page (2026)

Pricing model"CPM, CPA, flexible models" and "Transparent CPMs and cost visibility". No public rate card.

Source: Tatari insights: platform comparison page (2026)

InventoryBuys and measures across "Streaming TV, Linear TV, and Online Video" through programmatic and direct publisher buying. Named publishers: Not published on the pages we read.

Source: Tatari homepage

FitsBrands that buy streaming and linear TV together and want incrementality-led measurement

How does Tatari score on each criterion?

Tatari total: 7.30 / 10

Scroll the table sideways

Tatari: score and reason for each criterion. Editorial assessment, 0 to 10.
CriterionWeightScoreWhySource
Launch access15%5 / 10Brands launch with optional strategy and services and agencies license the platform; a public sign-up was not found on the pages we read.Tatari homepage
Outcome measurement20%9 / 10Tied highestCPV, CPI, CAC and ROAS by network, creative, DMA and platform, with DragFactor and multi-touch attribution.Tatari TV measurement
Incrementality and lift testing20%9 / 10Tied highestStates it measures the true incremental impact of TV.Tatari TV measurement
Control and automation15%7 / 10An AI-powered Planning Engine, log-level exports, reporting APIs and server-to-server sharing via Vault.Tatari insights: platform comparison page (2026)
Pricing and commitment clarity10%4 / 10Tied lowestStates flexible minimums and CPM, CPA or flexible models, with no dollar minimum or rate card.Tatari insights: platform comparison page (2026)
Published inventory reach10%7 / 10Streaming TV, linear TV and online video through programmatic and direct buying; named publishers are not on the pages we read.Tatari homepage
Enterprise and agency readiness10%8 / 10Optional strategy and services, agency licensing and a stated range up to $100m per year in TV spend.Tatari homepage

Which kinds of proof does Tatari describe?

Proof Card · 3 of 4 proof types described

Tatari Proof Card: 3 of 4 proof types described: outcome attribution, incrementality or lift, data access.OutcomeattributionIncrementalityor liftNamed measurementpartnersNot describedData access
Filled tileDescribed on the vendor's pagesHatched tileNot described on the pages we read
A filled tile means the vendor's own pages describe that kind of proof on the date shown. It does not rate how good the measurement is.

What do Tatari's own pages say?

Who it serves

"Whether you're new to TV or spending $100m per year"; brands launch "with optional strategy and services" and "Agencies can license the self-serve Tatari platform".

Source: Tatari homepage

Measurement

"Measure the true incremental impact"; metrics CPV, CPI, CAC and ROAS; DragFactor separates immediate from delayed response; reports by network, creative, DMA and platform; "Reporting APIs & Multi-Touch Attribution".

Source: Tatari TV measurement

Data sharing

Log-level exports and "Server-to-server data sharing via Vault (no pixel needed)".

Source: Tatari insights: platform comparison page (2026)

Planning

An AI-powered Planning Engine, programmatic plus direct publisher buying, and modeled ROAS.

Source: Tatari insights: platform comparison page (2026)

What are the pros and cons?

Pros

  • Measures streaming and linear TV together, with incrementality, DragFactor and multi-touch attribution described.
  • Log-level exports and server-to-server data sharing without a pixel.
  • Optional strategy services and agency licensing of the platform.

Cons

  • A public sign-up was not found on the pages we read; brands launch with optional services and agencies license the platform.
  • No dollar minimum or rate card is published ("flexible minimums").

Who is Tatari a fit for?

Brands that buy streaming and linear TV together and want incrementality-led measurement.

Tatari fits brands that plan streaming and linear TV together and want measurement built around incremental impact, with log-level data access. It reads as a platform with services around it rather than a sign-up-and-go tool, and its minimums are described as flexible rather than stated.

How does Tatari compare head to head?

Alternatives to TatariCompare Tatari with others side by side

Frequently asked questions

How much does Tatari cost?

"Tatari supports flexible minimums"; no dollar figure stated. "CPM, CPA, flexible models" and "Transparent CPMs and cost visibility". No public rate card. Confirm current terms with Tatari before you plan a budget.

Does Tatari offer incrementality or lift testing?

Yes, according to its own pages: "Measure the true incremental impact" of TV.

What are the main alternatives to Tatari?

On our weights the highest-ranked alternatives are Vibe, StackAdapt and tvScientific. See the full list on the alternatives page.

Keep watching